Root cause analysis

A root cause analysis template that walks each incident through a structured 5 whys investigation, ending in a corrective action with an owner.

About this template

A root cause investigation that stops at "human error" hasn't found the root cause. This template forces the "why" question at least five times, so the corrective action addresses the process gap that let the problem happen — not just the immediate trigger.

Each card holds a specific, measurable problem statement, the chain of whys, the root cause, and two separate actions: a containment action that stops the immediate problem right away, and a corrective action, owned and dated, that fixes the root cause so it doesn't come back. Group related incidents by category to spot the same root cause showing up across different symptoms.

An RCA isn't done when the corrective action is assigned — it's done once you've verified the problem hasn't recurred. Move the card to Verified only after that check, not the moment the fix ships.

Pairs well with a lessons learned template if you also want to capture the softer, process-level takeaways alongside the formal investigation.

What’s inside

Columns included

ReportedInvestigatingRoot cause identifiedAction plannedResolvedVerified

Task types

IncidentDefectProcess failureCustomer complaint

Custom fields

Problem statement5 whysRoot causeContributing factorsContainment actionCorrective actionOwnerDue dateVerified date

Key features

  • Structured 5 whys field to force past the surface symptom
  • Containment and corrective action tracked separately, so a quick workaround doesn't get mistaken for the fix
  • Verification step to confirm the root cause is actually gone before closing
  • Category tagging to spot recurring root causes
  • Contributing factors field for causes beyond the primary one
  • Works for incidents, defects, and customer complaints alike

Who is this template for?

  • Engineering teams running incident postmortems
  • QA teams investigating recurring defects
  • Support teams tracking customer-impacting failures
  • Operations teams auditing process breakdowns
  • Manufacturing and ops teams doing formal RCA

How to use this template

Use this board to move an incident from report to a documented, owned corrective action — and confirm it actually worked.

Step 1

Write a specific, measurable problem statement

Name what happened with numbers, not a vague summary — "checkout errors rose from 1% to 8% starting March 3" instead of "checkout is broken." Don't jump to a cause yet.

Step 2

Ask why, at least five times

Chain the whys until you reach a process-level cause rather than a person or a one-off event.

Step 3

Contain, then fix the root cause

Log a containment action to stop the bleeding now, and a separate corrective action — with an owner and due date — that addresses the root cause so it doesn't resurface.

Step 4

Verify before closing

Only move the card to Verified once you've checked the problem hasn't recurred. Resolved means the fix shipped; Verified means it worked.

Ready to get started?
Learn how to create a board from this template in just a few steps.
Read the step-by-step guide

Frequently asked questions

A structured method for tracing a problem back past its symptoms to the process or system gap that actually caused it, usually via repeated "why" questions.

Ask "why did this happen" about the answer to the previous why, repeating roughly five times until you reach a cause you can actually fix.

RCA is a formal investigation into a specific incident or defect. Lessons learned is broader and can cover an entire project or sprint, including things that went well.

One that points to a process, system, or decision — not a person. If your root cause is "someone made a mistake," ask why the process allowed that mistake to matter.

A containment action stops the immediate problem right away — a workaround. A corrective action fixes the root cause so it doesn't recur. Track both; a containment fix left in place too long gets mistaken for a real solution.

Not when the corrective action is assigned — when you've verified the root cause is actually gone and the problem hasn't recurred. That's what the Verified date field and the Verified column are for; don't close the card on Resolved alone.

Yes — an RCA finding often becomes a new risk or a mitigation item elsewhere. Relate the cards so the connection stays visible.

Yes — use task types to categorize by incident type, then filter to see if the same root cause keeps appearing under different symptoms.

Related templates